4.3 Article

Genetic diversity and differentiation of the endangered Japanese endemic tree Magnolia stellata using nuclear and chloroplast microsatellite markers

Journal

CONSERVATION GENETICS
Volume 6, Issue 4, Pages 563-574

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10592-005-9011-y

Keywords

cpDNA; genetic diversity; microsatellites; star magnolia; vulnerable

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Genetic diversity and differentiation were analyzed in 11 populations of Magnolia stellata (Sieb. and Zucc.) Maxim. (Magnoliaceae) in the Tokai district, Japan. Variation at four nuclear microsatellite (nSSR) loci was examined, three chloroplast microsatellite (cpSSR) markers were developed and 13 haplotypes identified. The 11 populations were divided into three groups (A, B and C). Each population within the group was separated less than 40 km. Group B harbored the highest gene diversity (H) and allelic richness (Ar) for nSSR (H=0.74 and Ar=8.02). Group C had the highest diversity of chloroplast haplotypes (H=0.79 and Ar=6.8): 2.5 times more haplotypes than the other groups. Each population contributed differently to the total diversity, with respect to nSSR and cpSSR. AMOVA revealed that 58% of haplotypic and 15% of nSSR variation was partitioned among populations within groups. A Mantel test revealed significant correlations between population pairwise geographic ln(distance) and F-ST/(1-F-ST) for both nSSR (r=0.479; P=0.001) and cpSSR (r=0.230; P=0.040). Dendrograms of populations for nSSR, based on Nei's genetic distance, were constructed using UPGMA and the neighbor-joining method. These results suggest that populations in group C have diverged from the other populations, while those in group B are similar to each other. For group B, fragmentation between populations should be avoided in order to maintain gene flow. For group C, the uniqueness of each population should be given the highest priority when planning genetic conservation measures for the species.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available