4.2 Article

Predictors of atrial antitachycardia pacing efficacy in patients affected by Brady-Tachy form of sick sinus syndrome and implanted with a DDDRP device

Journal

JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY
Volume 16, Issue 7, Pages 714-723

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2005.40716.x

Keywords

antitachycardia pacing; termination efficacy predictors; atrial fibrillation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Recent options to treat atrial tachyarrhythmias (ATA) include implantable devices delivering antitachycardia pacing therapies (ATP). No prospective study selected patients with higher chances of episode termination by ATP or indicated the most effective ATP use. Our aim was to study ATP efficacy in patients with brady-tachy form of sinus node disease (SND), identifying clinical factors, ATA characteristics, and device features predicting ATP efficacy. Methods and Results: Three hundred and sixteen patients (105 M, aged 71.1 +/- 8.8 years) received a DDDRP pacemaker and were prospectively followed. Median follow-up was 18 months: 37,125 ATA episodes occurred in 217 patients; ATP treated 5,536 of them. Overall, ATP efficacy was 50.0%. A multivariate analysis identified longer arrhythmia cycle lengths (OR = 1.25; CI = 1.07-1.47) and shorter delays to ATP delivery (OR = 0.15; CI = 0.10-0.22) as independent predictors of ATP efficacy for episodes preceded by >= 5 minutes of sinus rhythm. Additionally, ATP efficacy for all treated episodes was predicted by lower New York Heart Association (NYHA) class (OR = 0.64; CI = 0.42-0.98), episode classification as nonimmediate recurrence of ATA (non-IRAT) (OR = 0.07; CI = 0.02-0.33), absence of overlap in the device detection windows (OR = 0.54; CI = 0.32-0.91), and flecainide treatment (OR = 2.22; CI = 1.04-4.71). Conclusions: In patients paced for SND, multivariate analysis shows that ATP efficacy is associated to longer arrhythmia cycle lengths, shorter ATP delivery delays, NYHA class I, episode classification as non-IRAT, absence of overlap in the atrial arrhythmia device detection windows, and flecainide treatment.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available