4.7 Article

Ultra-potent antibodies against respiratory syncytial virus: Effects of binding kinetics and binding valence on viral neutralization

Journal

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Volume 350, Issue 1, Pages 126-144

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2005.04.049

Keywords

affinity maturation; kinetics manipulation; respiratory syncytial virus; Synagis (R); palivizumab

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We describe here the selection of ultra-potent anti-respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) antibodies for preventing RSV infection. A large number of antibody variants derived from Synagis (R) (palivizumab), an anti-RSV monoclonal antibody that targets RSV F protein, were generated by a directed evolution approach that hallowed convenient manipulation of the binding kinetics. Palivizumab variants with about 100-fold slower dissociation rates or with fivefold faster association rates were identified and tested for their ability to neutralize virus in a microneutralization assay. Our data reveal a major differential effect of the association and dissociation rates on the RSV neutralization, particularly for intact antibodies wherein the association rate plays the predominant role. Furthermore, we found that antibody binding valence also plays a critical role in mediating the viral neutralization through a mechanism that is likely unrelated to antibody size or binding avidity. We applied an iterative mutagenesis approach, and thereafter were able to identify palivizumab Fab variants with up to 1500-fold improvement and palivizumab IgG variants with up to 44-fold improvement in the ability to neutralize RSV. These anti-RSV antibodies likely will offer great clinical potential for RSV immunoprophylaxis. In addition, our findings provide insights into engineering potent antibody therapeutics for other disease targets. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available