4.7 Article

Identification of factors that contribute to recombinant AAV2 particle aggregation and methods to prevent its occurrence during vector purification and formulation

Journal

MOLECULAR THERAPY
Volume 12, Issue 1, Pages 171-178

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.ymthe.2005.02.021

Keywords

adeno-associated virus; vector aggregation; ionic strength

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aggregation of recombinant AAV2 results in reduced yield during purification and may have deleterious effects on vector transduction efficiency, biodistribution and immunogenicity following in vivo administration. Studies to elucidate the mechanism of vector aggregation and methods to prevent its occurrence are reported. In excipient screening studies, the sugars sorbitol, sucrose, mannitol, trehalose, or glycerol at concentrations of up to 5% (w/v), or surfactants Tween 80 or Pluronic F68, did not prevent aggregation. Aggregation was prevented by the use of various salts at concentrations corresponding to solution ionic strengths of > 200 mM. AAV2 vectors purified by double cesium chloride gradient centrifugation, cation-exchange chromatography, or combined chromatography and gradient centrifugation each demonstrated a similar requirement for ionic strength to prevent aggregation. AAV2 vectors concentrated to 6.7 x 10(13) vector genome (vg)/mL in neutral-buffered isotonic saline resulted in 59 +/- 6.0% recovery of nonaggregated material compared to 96 +/- 4.4% recovery in an isotonic formulation with elevated ionic strength. The latter showed no aggregation following storage or after 10 freeze-thaw cycles at -20 degrees C. AAV2 vectors stored for an extended period in an elevated ionic strength formulation retained a high infectivity titer (13 vg/infectious unit) and transduction efficiency. Nuclease digestion of purified AAV2 vectors reduced aggregation, implicating trace amounts of vector surface nucleic acids in interparticle binding.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available