4.7 Article

Involvement of renal progenitor tubular cells in epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition in fibrotic rat kidneys

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEPHROLOGY
Volume 16, Issue 7, Pages 2044-2051

Publisher

AMER SOC NEPHROLOGY
DOI: 10.1681/ASN.2004080681

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Renal progenitor tubular cells (label-retaining cells [LRC]) were recently identified in normal kidneys by in vivo bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) labeling. This study was conducted to examine the behavior of LRC in renal fibrosis. BrdU was injected intraperitoneally into normal rats daily for 7 d. After a 2-wk chase period, unilateral ureteral obstruction (UUO) was induced in these rats. In normal and contralateral kidneys, LRC were observed scattering among tubular epithelial cells. After UUO, the number of the LRC significantly increased, and most of them were positive for proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA). In contrast, PCNA(+) cells lacking BrdU label were rarely observed. It is interesting that LRC were detected not only in tubules but also in the interstitium after UUO. Laminin staining showed that a number of the LRC were adjacent to the destroyed tubular basement membrane. Some tubules, including LRC, lost the expression of E-cadherin after UUO. A large number of cell populations expressed vimentin, heat shock protein 47, or alpha-smooth muscle actin in the UUO kidneys, and each population contained LRC. None of the LRC was positive for these fibroblastic markers in contralateral kidneys. When renal tubules from BrdU-treated rats were cultured in the gel, some cells protruded from the periphery of the tubules and migrated into the gel. Most of these cells were BrdU(+). Neither the total content of BrdU in the kidneys nor the number of LRC in bone marrow significantly changed after UUO. Collectively, these results suggest that LRC is a cell population that proliferates, migrates, and trans differentiates into fibroblast-like cells during renal fibrosis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available