4.7 Article

Antimicrobial peptide therapeutics for cystic fibrosis

Journal

ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY
Volume 49, Issue 7, Pages 2921-2927

Publisher

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/AAC.49.7.2921-2927.2005

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Greater than 90% of lung infections in cystic fibrosis (CF) patients are caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and the majority of these patients subsequently die from lung damage. Current therapies are either targeted at reducing obstruction, reducing inflammation, or reducing infection. To identify potential therapeutic agents for the CF lung, 150 antimicrobial peptides consisting of three distinct structural classes were screened against mucoid and multidrug-resistant clinical isolates of P. aeruginosa, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, Achromobacter xylosoxidans, and Staphylococcus aureus. Five peptides that retained potent antimicrobial activities in physiological salt and divalent cation environment were further characterized in vivo using a rat chronic lung infection model. All animals were inoculated intratracheally with 10(4) A aeruginosa mucoid PAO1 cells in agar beads. Three days following inoculation treatment was initiated. Animals were treated daily for 3 days with 100 mu l of peptide solution (1 mg/ml) in 10 mM sodium citrate, which was deposited via either intratracheal instillation or aerosolization. Control animals received daily exposure to vehicle alone. At the end of the treatment the lungs of the animals were removed for quantitative culture. Four peptides, HBCM2, HBCM3, HBCP alpha-2, and HB71, demonstrated significant reduction in Pseudomonas bioburden in the lung of rats. Further in vivo studies provided direct evidence that anti-inflammatory activity was associated with three of these peptides. Therefore, small bioactive peptides have the potential to attack two of the components responsible for the progression of lung damage in the CF disease: infection and inflammation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available