4.0 Article

Evoked electromyographic technique for quantitative assessment of the innervation status of laryngeal muscles

Journal

ANNALS OF OTOLOGY RHINOLOGY AND LARYNGOLOGY
Volume 114, Issue 7, Pages 563-572

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/000348940511400713

Keywords

denervation; evoked electromyography; laryngeal muscle; recurrent laryngeal nerve; reinnervation; vocal fold paralysis

Funding

  1. NIDCD NIH HHS [R01 DC001149] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to develop a minimally invasive, noninjurious evoked electromyographic technique that could accurately quantitate the level of innervation of laryngeal muscles with recurrent laryngeal nerve stimulation. Methods: A four-phase study was conducted in 24 canines, including 1) identification of the best stimulation-recording configuration, 2) statistical analysis of sensitivity and accuracy, 3) evaluation of safety, and 4) identification of the laryngeal muscle(s) that contribute to the evoked response. Results: The results demonstrated that an entirely noninvasive technique is not feasible. The stimulating cathode must be invasive to ensure discrete activation of the recurrent laryngeal nerve, whereas both recording electrodes should remain on the surface with one overlying the thyroid ala. This configuration proved to be highly accurate, with an error rate of only 6% to 7%, and with sensitivity sufficient to detect a signal in a nerve with fewer than 1% of the axons intact. There was no evidence of nerve injury in any animal over the course of 350 stimulus needle penetrations. By use of neuromuscular blockade to identify those muscles generating the surface response, the thyroarytenoid muscle was found to be the primary contributor, whereas the posterior cricoarytenoid muscle was uninvolved. Conclusions: This evoked electromyographic technique could provide quantitative information regarding the extent of muscle innervation during denervation and regeneration in case of laryngeal paralysis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available