4.7 Article

Influence of seismic cyclic loading history on small strain shear modulus of saturated sands

Journal

SOIL DYNAMICS AND EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING
Volume 25, Issue 5, Pages 341-353

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2005.03.001

Keywords

cyclic loading seismic response analysis; undrained cyclic triaxial test; sands; small strain shear modulus; effective stress; soil fabric; bender element

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Small strain shear modulus G(max) is a key parameter together with the state of stress and shear strain amplitude for predicting the dynamic behavior of soils. Although the seismic cyclic loading on saturated soil deposits induces a decrease in effective stress and a rearrangement of the soil skeleton which may both lead to a degradation in undrained stiffness and strength of soils, only the contribution of effective stress reduction to G(max) degradation is considered in the Hardin and Richart equation which is widely used in seismic response analysis nowadays, and that of soil fabric change is neglected. In this paper, undrained cyclic triaxial tests were conducted on normally and isotropically consolidated saturated sands with the shear wave velocity measured intermittently by bender element during cyclic liquefaction, to study the influences of seismic cyclic loading history on small strain shear modulus G(max) during earthquake. And the G(max) values of samples without such influences were investigated for comparison. The tests results indicate that G(max) of sand under high amplitude seismic cyclic loading history influences is moderately lower than the corresponding value of non-cyclic loading effects at the same effective stress. Hence it is necessary to reinvestigate the determination of G(max) in seismic response analysis carefully to predict the ground responses more reasonably. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available