4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Kinetic mechanism studies on reactions of mercury and oxidizing species in coal combustion

Journal

FUEL
Volume 84, Issue 10, Pages 1215-1220

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2004.09.027

Keywords

mercury; kinetic mechanism; quantum chemistry; coal combustion; ab initio calculations

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The emission of mercury by coal-fired power plants has become a recent concern on the part of the electric utility industry. Knowledge of mercury kinetic mechanisms is imperative for the research of predicting mercury transformation and finding its effective control methods in coal combustion flue gas. Near the end of the flue gas path, mercury exists as a combination of elemental vapor and HgCl2 vapor. HgCl2 is more likely to be removed from the flue gas. Thus, the degree of oxidation is considered to be a critical factor that tends to reduce emission. In the present work, the microcosmic kinetic mechanisms of reactions between mercury and oxidizing species were investigated by ab initio calculations of quantum chemistry. The geometry optimizations of reactants, transition states, intermediates and products were made by the quantum chemistry MP2 method at SDD basis function level. All molecule energies were calculated at QCISD(T)/SDD level and corrected with zero point energy. The activation energies and heat of reactions were calculated. The reaction rate constants were calculated from transition state theory (TST). The performance of the ab initio calculations of quantum chemistry was assessed through comparisons with the literature data. The comparisons showed that the ab initio calculations of quantum chemistry were in agreement with the literature data. The results showed that quantum chemistry was an effective means for investigating kinetic mechanism of mercury interaction with combustion-generated flue gas. (c) 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available