4.5 Article

Increased reproductive output in stereotypic captive Rhabdomys females: Potential implications for captive breeding

Journal

APPLIED ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR SCIENCE
Volume 123, Issue 1-2, Pages 63-69

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.applanim.2009.12.013

Keywords

Conservation; External validity; Fitness; Reproduction; Stereotypic behaviour; Striped mice

Funding

  1. National Research Foundation [2069110]
  2. University of the Witwatersrand
  3. Johannesburg Zoo

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Captive animal populations can diverge considerably from populations in the wild, despite the animals not being deliberately domesticated. If the phenotypes which are of benefit in captivity are heritable, the genotypes of captive-stock can diverge swiftly and substantially from wild-stock. Using striped mice, Rhabdomys, we tested the relationship between reproductive output and stereotypic behaviour, a heritable repetitive abnormal behaviour common in captive wild animals. Individuals (n = 120: 60 male, 60 female) were assigned to pairs in one of four treatment groups formed from combinations of non-stereotypic and stereotypic mothers and fathers, and various measures of reproductive output were recorded. Reproductive output (e.g. total number of offspring) for stereotypic females (but not stereotypic males) was significantly greater than for non-stereotypic striped mice. We suggest that, overall, unintended selection is likely to increase the incidence of stereotypic behaviour in a captive striped mouse population because (1) stereotypic females breed more successfully than non-stereotypic striped mice, and (2) genetic variance underlies the trait. The potential implications of these findings for the validity of behavioural studies using captive-bred wild animals and for conservation breeding programmes are discussed. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available