4.8 Article

On the response of a label-free interferon-γ immunosensor utilizing electrochemical impedance spectroscopy

Journal

BIOSENSORS & BIOELECTRONICS
Volume 21, Issue 1, Pages 49-59

Publisher

ELSEVIER ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY
DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2004.10.009

Keywords

immunosensor; impedance spectroscopy; electrochemical protein detection; IFN-gamma

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The research on our flow-injection, label-free, non-faradaic impedimetric immunosensor for interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma) has been extended. The sensor is prepared by immobilization of anti-IFN-gamma antibodies on a self-assembled monolayer (SAM) of acetylcysteine, deposited on polycrystalline gold. A multi-frequency impedance method is described, which allows time-resolved measurement of Nyquist plots. To these plots, an equivalent circuit was fitted, which is discussed in terms of a two-layer structure (inner and outer layer) of the interfacial region. Because binding of IFN-gamma mainly causes a decrease of Q (a constant-phase element), this element is considered as the outer layer. Several aspects of the impedimetric sensor response are studied, including the dependence on detection frequency, target concentration and applied dc potential. For quantitative detection of IFN-gamma, an optimum of the signal-to-noise (S/N) ratio of the out-of-phase impedance component (Z'') was found at about 100 Hz. At a dc-potential of +0.2 V versus a saturated calomel reference electrode, the sensor response is higher than at 0.0 V. Logarithmic dose-response curves of IFN-gamma in the concentration range of 10(-18) to 10(-9) M were obtained using two procedures: by successive injections over a single electrode, and by using freshly prepared electrodes for each measurement. Using the latter method, the repeatability is impaired. The need for in situ complementary techniques for a correct interpretation of the studied parameters is discussed. (c) 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available