4.5 Article

Comparison of protein solubilization methods suitable for proteomic analysis of soybean seed proteins

Journal

ANALYTICAL BIOCHEMISTRY
Volume 342, Issue 2, Pages 214-220

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ab.2005.04.046

Keywords

proteomics; soybean seeds; Glycine max; MALDI-TOF-MS; LC-MS; 2D-PAGE; glycinin; beta-conglycinin

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Extraction of soybean seed proteins for two-dimensional polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (2D-PAGE) and mass spectrometry analysis is challenging and inconsistent. In this study, we compared four different protein extraction/solubilization methods-urea. thiourea/urea, phenol, and a modified trichloroacetic acid (TCA)/acetone-to determine their efficacy in separating soybean seed proteins by 2D-PAGE. In all four methods, seed storage proteins were well separated by 2D-PAGE with minor variations in the intensity of the spots. The thiourea/urea and TCA methods showed higher protein resolution and spot intensity of all proteins compared with the other two methods. In addition, several less abundant and high molecular weight proteins were clearly resolved and strongly detected using the thiourea/urea and TCA methods. Protein spots obtained from the TCA method were subjected to mass spectrometry analysis to test their quality and compatibility. Fifteen protein spots were selected.. digested with trypsin, and analyzed using matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF-MS) and liquid chromatography mass spectrometry (LC-MS). The proteins identified were beta-conglycinin, glycinin, Kunitz trypsin inhibitor, alcohol dehydrogenase, Gly m Bd 28K allergen, and sucrose binding proteins. These results Suggest that the thiourea/urea and TCA methods are efficient and reliable methods for 2D separation of soybean seed proteins and subsequent identification by mass spectrometry. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available