4.5 Article

MK-801 and dextromethorphan block microglial activation and protect against methamphetamine-induced neurotoxicity

Journal

BRAIN RESEARCH
Volume 1050, Issue 1-2, Pages 190-198

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2005.05.049

Keywords

methamphetamine; microglia; MK-801; dextromethorphan; dopamine; neurotoxicity

Categories

Funding

  1. NIDA NIH HHS [DA014692, DA 10756] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIEHS NIH HHS [P30ES006639] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Methamphetamine causes long-term toxicity to dopamine nerve endings of the striatum. Evidence is emerging that microglia can contribute to the neuronal damage associated with disease, injury, or inflammation, but their role in methamphetamine-induced neurotoxicity has received relatively little attention. Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and the neurotoxic HIV Tat protein, which cause dopamine neuronal toxicity after direct infusion into brain, cause activation of cultured mouse microglial cells as evidenced by increased expression of intracellular cyclooxygenase-2 and elevated secretion of tumor necrosis factor-alpha. MK-801, a non-competitive NMDA receptor antagonist that is known to protect against methamphetamine neurotoxicity, prevents microglial activation by LPS and HIV Tat. Dextromethorphan, an antitussive agent with NMDA receptor blocking properties, also prevents microglial activation. In vivo, MK-801 and dextromethorphan reduce methamphetamine-induced activation of microglia in striatum and they protect dopamine nerve endings against drug-induced nerve terminal damage. The present results indicate that the ability of MK-801 and dextromethorphan to protect against methamphetamine neurotoxicity is related to their common property as blockers of microglial activation. (C) 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available