4.6 Article Proceedings Paper

Strategies to avoid the mis-identification of anatoxin-a using mass spectrometry in the forensic investigation of acute neurotoxic poisoning

Journal

JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A
Volume 1082, Issue 1, Pages 91-97

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2005.05.040

Keywords

cyanobacteria; neurotoxins; LC-MS; quadrupole time-of-flight

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Anatoxin-a (AN) is a potent neurotoxin, produced by a number of cyanobacterial species, and consumption of freshwater contaminated with this toxin has led to animal deaths. Forensic investigations of suspected AN poisonings are frequently hampered by difficulties in detecting this toxin in biological matrices due to its rapid decay. In addition, detection of AN using single quadrupole mass spectrometry (MS) is suspect due to the presence of the amino acid, phenylalanine (Phe), since these compounds are isobaric and elute similarly in reversed phase liquid chromatography (LC). Approaches to prevent the misidentification of AN that have been explored in these studies included: (a) fluorimetric LC following derivatisation using 4-fluoro-7-nitro-2,1,3-benzoxadiazole (NBD-F); (b) methylation using diazomethane prior to LC-MS determination; (c) multiple tandem MS using a quadrupole ion-trap (LC-MS(3)); and (d) hybrid quadrupole time-of-flight (QqTOF). Interference from Phe was not observed in any of procedures, (a)-(c), and the high mass accuracy obtained in method (d), readily distinguished between AN (165.11536) and Phe (165.07898). LC-MS(n) was also employed to study the fragmentation pathway of Phe and multi-stage MS spectra provided characteristic fragmentation information that clearly distinguished between AN and Phe. The difficulties associated with the over reliance on low resolution MS without MS/MS data in forensic toxicology are discussed. (c) 2005 Published by Elsevier B.V.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available