4.4 Article

Genetic variation among portuguese landraces of 'Arrancada' wheat and Triticum petropavlovskyi by AFLP-based assessment

Journal

GENETIC RESOURCES AND CROP EVOLUTION
Volume 52, Issue 5, Pages 619-628

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10722-005-6843-8

Keywords

AFLP; 'Arrancada'; diversity; introgression; Long glume; P locus; Triticum durum; Triticum petropavlovskyi; Triticum polonicum; Triticum turanicum

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Portuguese wheat landraces, 'Arrancada' were collected from the Aveiro region, Portugal before the 1950s. We found in eight accessions of `Arrancada' hexaploid wheat with the long glume phenotype. We assessed the comparative genetic diversity among Portuguese `Arrancada' wheat and Triticum petropavlovskyi Udacz. et Migusch. using AFLP assays and discuss the origin of long glumed `Arrancada' wheat. With the four primer pairs a total of 4885 visible bands were scored corresponding to 99 AFLP markers as putative loci, of which 55 markers (54%) were polymorphic. UPGMA clustering and PCO grouping showed that long glumed 'Arrancada' wheat and T. petropavlovskyi were genetically diverse. Long glumed 'Arrancada' hexaploid wheat separated into two clusters (groups) in both the UPGMA dendrogram and in PCO analysis. Four long glumed accessions fell in the cluster of tetraploid wheat. A similar argument could be made for another four accessions which belong to the cluster of hexaploid wheat. The substantial level of genetic variation indicated that long glumed 'Arrancada' wheat and T. petropavlovskyi originated independently. It is most likely that the P-gene of long glumed 'Arrancada' hexaploid wheat was introduced from T. turgidum ssp. polonicum (L.) Thell. to T. aestivum via natural introgression or breeding. We suggest that the long glumed 'Arrancada' hexaploid wheat did not originate from T. aestivum through spontaneous mutation at the P locus.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available