3.9 Article

Differentiation of the radiation-induced necrosis and tumor recurrence after gamma knife radiosurgery for brain metastases: Importance of multi-voxel proton MRS

Journal

MINIMALLY INVASIVE NEUROSURGERY
Volume 48, Issue 4, Pages 228-234

Publisher

GEORG THIEME VERLAG KG
DOI: 10.1055/s-2005-870952

Keywords

gamma knife radiosurgery; radiation necrosis; tumor recurrence; proton MRS

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Comparative analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of FDG PET, single-voxel, and multi-voxel proton MRS for differentiation between radiation-induced necrosis and tumor recurrence was done in 9 patients with brain metastases treated by gamma knife radiosurgery. In all cases enlargement of the lesion and increase of the perilesional edema were demonstrated by MRI on average 10.6 +/- 2.6 months after initial treatment. Radiation-induced necrosis was identified in 5 patients (histologically in 2, clinically in 3). In one of these a false positive result of FDG PET was observed, whereas data of proton MRS were always correct. The diagnosis of tumor recurrence was established in 4 patients (histologically in 3, clinically in 1). Among these both FDG PET and single-voxel proton MRS showed false negative results (each method twice), whereas multi-voxel proton MRS always permitted us to establish the correct diagnosis. The present study demonstrates the higher diagnostic accuracy of multi-voxel proton MRS, in comparison with single-voxel proton MRS and FDG PET, for the differentiation of the radiation-induced necrosis and tumor recurrence. Its use is especially important in mixed lesions with co-existence of both post-irradiation changes and viable neoplasm. Monitoring of the treatment response by serial multivoxel proton MRS seems to be reasonable during follow-up of patients with brain metastases after radiosurgery.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.9
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available