4.7 Article

Activation of c-Jun-N-terminal kinase is required for apoptosis triggered by glutathione disulfide in neuroblastoma cells

Journal

FREE RADICAL BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE
Volume 39, Issue 3, Pages 345-354

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2005.03.022

Keywords

apoptosis; MAP kinase pathway; neuroblastoma; glutathione; ROS; oxidative stress

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Changes in intracellular redox status are crucial events that trigger downstream proliferation or death responses through activation of specific signaling pathways. Moreover, cell responses to oxidative challenge may depend on the pattern of redox-sensitive molecular factors. The stress-activated protein kinases c-Jun-N-terminal kinase (JNK) and p38 MAP kinase (p38(MAPK)) are implicated in different forms of apoptotic neuronal cell death. Here, we investigated the effects, on neuroblastoma cells, of the prooxidant molecule GSSG, which we previously demonstrated to be an efficient proapoptotic compound able to activate the p38(MAPK) death pathway in promonocytic cells. We found that neuroblastoma cells are not prone to GSSG-induced apoptosis, although the treatment slightly induced growth arrest through the accumulation of p53 and its downstream target gene, p21. However, GSSG treatment became cytotoxic when cells were previously depleted of intracellular GSH content. Under this condition, apoptosis was triggered by an increased production of superoxide that led to a specific activation of the JNK-dependent pathway. The involvement of superoxide and JNK was demonstrated by cell death inhibition in experiments carried out in the presence of Cu,Zn superoxide dismutase or with specific inhibitors of JNK activity. Our data give support to the studies that indicate preferential requirements for the involvement of stress-activated kinases in apoptotic neuronal cells. (c) 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available