4.4 Article

Growth and yield of broccoli as affected by the nitrogen content of transplants and the timing of nitrogen fertilization

Journal

HORTSCIENCE
Volume 40, Issue 5, Pages 1320-1323

Publisher

AMER SOC HORTICULTURAL SCIENCE
DOI: 10.21273/HORTSCI.40.5.1320

Keywords

Brassica oleracea var. italica; field vegetable

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The nitrogen requirement of broccoli (Brassica oleracea var. italica) ranges from 300 to 465 kg.ha(-1). Recommendations for N fertilization are accordingly high. High fertilizer rates applied at planting result in a high soil mineral N content that remains high for weeks because the N requirement of the crop is low at early growth stages. Therefore, the risk of leaching is high for several weeks until the available N is finally taken up by the crop. Our study had two objectives: 1) to quantify yield responses to preplant fertilization, and 2) to test our hypothesis that the preplant fertilization rate could be reduced without yield losses by increasing the N content in the transplants and improving crop establishment. Field experiments were carried out on transplants with four levels of N content in dry matter (0.018 to 0.038 g.g(-1) dry weight), which were tested in all combinations with four fertilization timings. All treatments received the same amount of N fertilizer (270 and 272 kg.ha(-1) in 2001 and 2002, respectively), but with different rates of supply at the time of planting (0 to 90 kg.ha(-1) N fertilizer plus 30 and 28 kg.ha(-1) soil mineral N in 2001 and 2002, respectively). Total and marketable yields increased significantly with an increasing N supply at time of planting. In our experiments, in which topdressing was applied 25 days after planting, an N supply at planting of 80 to 118 kg.ha(-1) was required to obtain maximum marketable yields. The N content in transplants had little effect on growth and yield, and there were no significant interactions between the N content in the transplant and fertilizer timing.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available