4.6 Article

The association of body mass index and pancreatic cancer in residents of southeastern Michigan, 1996-1999

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
Volume 162, Issue 3, Pages 222-228

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwi183

Keywords

body mass index; case-control studies; pancreatic neoplasms; risk factors

Funding

  1. NCI NIH HHS [R25-CA57716] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIEHS NIH HHS [R01 ES07129] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Increased body mass index has emerged as a potential risk factor for pancreatic cancer. The authors examined whether the association between body mass index and pancreatic cancer was modified by gender, smoking, and diabetes in residents of southeastern Michigan, 1996-1999. A total of 231 patients with newly diagnosed adenocarcinoma of the exocrine pancreas were compared with 388 general population controls. In-person interviews were conducted to ascertain information on demographic and lifestyle factors. Unconditional logistic regression models estimated the association between body mass index and pancreatic cancer. Males' risk for pancreatic cancer significantly increased with increasing body mass index (p(trend) = 0.048), while no relation was found for women (p(trend) = 0.37). Among nonsmokers, those in the highest category of body mass index were 3.3 times (95% confidence interval: 1.2, 9.2) more likely to have pancreatic cancer compared with those with low body mass index. In contrast, no relation was found for smokers (p(trend) = 0.94). While body mass index was not associated with pancreatic cancer risk among insulin users (p(trend) = 0.11), a significant increase in risk was seen in non-insulin users (p(trend) = 0.039). This well-designed, population-based study offered further evidence that increased body mass index is related to pancreatic cancer risk, especially for men and nonsmokers. In addition, body mass index may play a role in the etiology of pancreatic cancer even in the absence of diabetes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available