Journal
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE
Volume 54, Issue 2, Pages 366-372Publisher
WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.20556
Keywords
arterial spin labeling; perfusion; adiabatic inversion; magnetization transfer; blood flow
Funding
- NIA NIH HHS [R01 AG19599] Funding Source: Medline
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Background suppression strategies for arterial spin labeling (ASL) MRI offer reduced noise from motion and other system instabilities. However, the inversion pulses used for suppression can also attenuate the ASL signal, which may offset the advantages of background suppression. Numerical simulations were used to optimize the inversion efficiency of four candidate pulses over a range of radiofrequency (RF) and static magnetic field variations typical of in vivo imaging. Optimized pulses were then used within a pulsed ASL sequence to assess the pulses' in vivo inversion efficiencies for ASL. The measured in vivo inversion efficiency was significantly lower than theoretical predictions (e.g., 93% experimental compared to 99% theoretical) for the tangent hyperbolic pulse applied in a background suppression scheme. This inefficiency was supported by an in vitro study of human blood. These results suggest that slow magnetization transfer (MT) in blood, either with bound water or macromolecular protons, dominates the inversion inefficiency in blood. Despite the attenuated signal relative to unsuppressed ASL, the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) with suppression was 'improved by 23-110% depending on the size of the region measured. Knowledge of efficiency will aid optimization of the number of suppression pulses and provide more accurate quantification of blood flow.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available