4.7 Article

Telavancin:: in vitro activity against staphylococci in a biofilm model

Journal

JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY
Volume 56, Issue 2, Pages 337-343

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/jac/dki198

Keywords

pharmacokinetic models; glycopeptides; GISA; indwelling medical devices

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives: To assess the in vitro activity of the novel lipoglycopeptide telavancin against staphylococcal biofilms using an in vitro pharmacokinetic model. Methods: Using the Sorbarod model, biofilms were established. The strains tested included methicillin-susceptible and -resistant strains of Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase-negative staphylococci, as well as glycopeptide-intermediate S. aureus (GISA). The biofilms were exposed to exponentially decreasing concentrations of telavancin and four comparator antibiotics, vancomycin, teicoplanin, linezolid and moxifloxacin and the bactericidal activity of the antibiotics was assessed. The concentrations of the antibiotics used in these experiments corresponded to peak serum levels achievable in humans and the rates at which drug concentrations were decreased corresponded to their elimination half-lives. Results: All of the drugs tested produced a reduction in the number of bacteria eluted from the biofilms. Telavancin was more effective than the commercially available glycopeptides, vancomycin and teicoplanin, and of the three, was the most active agent against both the non-GISA and GISA strains. Of all the antibiotics tested, moxifloxacin produced the greatest reduction in biofilm cells, but only against the non-GISA strains. Conclusions: Telavancin exhibited substantial antimicrobial activity against staphylococcal biofilms, including GISA strains. This study supports the case for the evaluation of telavancin in the treatment of staphylococcal biofilm-associated infections.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available