4.6 Article

Criteria for Selection of Surrogates Used To Study the Fate and Control of Pathogens in the Environment

Journal

APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY
Volume 78, Issue 6, Pages 1969-1977

Publisher

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/AEM.06582-11

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Center for Advancing Microbial Risk Assessment
  2. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Science to Achieve Results
  3. U.S. Department of Homeland Security University [R3236201]
  4. National Research Council
  5. U.S. Department of Homeland Security

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article defines the term surrogate as an organism, particle, or substance used to study the fate of a pathogen in a specific environment. Pathogenic organisms, nonpathogenic organisms, and innocuous particles have been used as surrogates for a variety of purposes, including studies on survival and transport as well as for method development and as indicators of certain conditions. This article develops a qualitative surrogate attribute prioritization process and allows investigators to select a surrogate by systematically detailing the experimental process and prioritizing attributes. The results are described through the use of case studies of various laboratories that have used this process. This article also discusses the history of surrogate and microbial indicator use and outlines the method by which surrogates can be used when conducting a quantitative microbial risk assessment. The ultimate goal of selecting a sufficiently representative surrogate is to improve public health through a health-based risk assessment framework. Under-or overestimating the resistance, inactivation, or movement may negatively impact risk assessments that, in turn, will impact health assessments and estimated safety levels. Reducing uncertainty in a risk assessment is one of the objectives of using surrogates and the ultimate motive for any experiment investigating potential exposure of a pathogen.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available