4.7 Article

An intervention for parents to promote preschool children's sun protection:: Effects of Sun Protection is Fun!

Journal

PREVENTIVE MEDICINE
Volume 41, Issue 2, Pages 357-366

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2005.01.007

Keywords

skin neoplasms/*prevention and control; sunburn/*prevention and control; knowledge, attitudes, practice; child, preschool

Funding

  1. NCI NIH HHS [R01 CA 62918] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background. Young children are an important focus of sun-protection efforts, but there has been relatively little study of sun-protection interventions developed for preschool-aged children and their parents. This paper reports on the evaluation of Sun Protection is Fun! (S.P.F), designed to improve parents' practices and psychosocial outcomes related to protecting preschool children from sun exposure. Methods. A group-randomized trial was conducted in 20 preschools to evaluate the S.P.F parent intervention that included a video, newsletters, and handbooks. A separate, on-site intervention for preschool staff aimed to create a preschool climate that encouraged parents' sun protection for their children. Cross-sectional samples of parents completed surveys at baseline (n = 384), 12 months (n = 640), and 24 months (n = 694). Results. S.P.F demonstrated significant effects on parents' sun-avoidance strategies at 12 months (P <.05) and sunscreen use at 24 months (P <.05). There were significant intervention effects on parents' sun-protection knowledge (P <.001), perceived norms of teachers' sunscreen use (P <.001), sunscreen impediments (P <.05), and sunscreen expectancies (P <.05) at 12 months. Parents' perceived norms of teacher sunscreen use were significantly improved at 24 months (P <.001). Conclusions. More intense intervention strategies may need to complement take-home materials to result in greater effects on parents' sun protection for their children. (c) 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available