4.6 Article

Removal and Transfer of Viruses on Food Contact Surfaces by Cleaning Cloths

Journal

APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY
Volume 78, Issue 9, Pages 3037-3044

Publisher

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/AEM.00027-12

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. USDA NIFSI [10507316]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Contamination of food contact surfaces with pathogens is considered an important vehicle for the indirect transmission of food-borne diseases. Five different cleaning cloths were assessed for the ability to remove viruses from food contact surfaces (stainless steel surface and nonporous solid surface) and to transfer viruses back to these surfaces. Cleaning cloths evaluated include two different cellulose/cotton cloths, one microfiber cloth, one nonwoven cloth, and one cotton terry bar towel. Four viral surrogates (murine norovirus [MNV], feline calicivirus [FCV], bacteriophages PRD1 and MS2) were included. Removal of FCV from stainless steel was significantly greater (P <= 0.05) than that from nonporous solid surface, and overall removal of MNV from both surfaces was significantly less (P <= 0.05) than that of FCV and PRD1. Additionally, the terry towel removed significantly fewer total viruses (P <= 0.05) than the microfiber and one of the cotton/cellulose cloths. The cleaning cloth experiments were repeated with human norovirus. For transfer of viruses from cloth to surface, both cellulose/cotton cloths and microfiber transferred an average of 3.4 and 8.5 total PFU, respectively, to both surfaces, and the amounts transferred were significantly different (P <= 0.05) from those for the nonwoven cloth and terry towel (309 and 331 total PFU, respectively). There was no statistically significant difference (P>0.05) in the amount of virus transfer between surfaces. These data indicate that while the cleaning cloths assessed here can remove viruses from surfaces, some cloths may also transfer a significant amount of viruses back to food contact surfaces.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available