4.6 Article

Infections and Coinfections of Questing Ixodes ricinus Ticks by Emerging Zoonotic Pathogens in Western Switzerland

Journal

APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY
Volume 78, Issue 13, Pages 4606-4612

Publisher

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/AEM.07961-11

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Swiss National Foundation [310030-127064/1]
  2. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [310030_127064] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In Europe, Ixodes ricinus is the vector of many pathogens of medical and veterinary relevance, among them Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato and tick-borne encephalitis virus, which have been the subject of numerous investigations. Less is known about the occurrence of emerging tick-borne pathogens like Rickettsia spp., Babesia spp., Candidatus Neoehrlichia mikurensis, and Anaplasma phagocytophilum in questing ticks. In this study, questing nymph and adult L ricinus ticks were collected at 11 sites located in Western Switzerland. A total of 1,476 ticks were analyzed individually for the simultaneous presence of B. burgdorferi sensu lato, Rickettsia spp., Babesia spp., Candidatus Neoehrlichia mikurensis, and A. phagocytophilum. B. burgdorferi sensu lato, Rickettsia spp., and Candidatus Neoehrlichia mikurensis were detected in ticks at all sites with global prevalences of 22.5%, 10.2%, and 6.4%, respectively. Babesia- and A. phagocytophilum-infected ticks showed a more restricted geographic distribution, and their prevalences were lower (1.9% and 1.5%, respectively). Species rarely reported in Switzerland, like Borrelia spielmanii, Borrelia lusitaniae, and Rickettsia monacensis, were identified. Infections with more than one pathogenic species, involving mostly Borrelia spp. and Rickettsia helvetica, were detected in 19.6% of infected ticks. Globally, 34.2% of ticks were infected with at least one pathogen. The diversity of tick-borne pathogens detected in I. ricinus in this study and the frequency of coinfections underline the need to take them seriously into consideration when evaluating the risks of infection following a tick bite.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available