4.6 Article

Evidence of Host-Associated Populations of Cryptosporidium parvum in Italy

Journal

APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY
Volume 78, Issue 10, Pages 3523-3529

Publisher

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/AEM.07686-11

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. European Commission [SANCO/2006/FOODSAFETY/032]
  2. NIAID [AI052781]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recent studies have revealed extensive genetic variation among isolates of Cryptosporidium parvum, an Apicomplexan parasite that causes gastroenteritis in both humans and animals worldwide. The parasite's population structure is influenced by the intensity of transmission, the host-parasite interaction, and husbandry practices. As a result, C. parvum populations can be panmictic, clonal, or even epidemic on both a local scale and a larger geographical scale. To extend the study of C. parvum populations to an unexplored region, 173 isolates of C. parvum collected in Italy from humans and livestock (calf, sheep, and goat) over a 10-year period were genotyped using a multilocus scheme based on 7 mini- and microsatellite loci. In agreement with other studies, extensive polymorphism was observed, with 102 distinct multilocus genotypes (MLGs) identified among 173 isolates. The presence of linkage disequilibrium, the confinement of MLGs to individual farms, and the relationship of many MLGs inferred using network analysis (eBURST) suggest a predominantly clonal population structure, but there is also evidence that part of the diversity can be explained by genetic exchange. MLGs from goats were found to differ from bovine and sheep MLGs, supporting the existence of C. parvum subpopulations. Finally, MLGs from isolates collected between 1997 and 1999 were also identified as a distinct subgroup in principal-component analysis and eBURST analysis, suggesting a continuous introduction of novel genotypes in the parasite population.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available