4.8 Article

Fractionation of the three stable oxygen isotopes by oxygen-producing and oxygen-consuming reactions in photosynthetic organisms

Journal

PLANT PHYSIOLOGY
Volume 138, Issue 4, Pages 2292-2298

Publisher

AMER SOC PLANT BIOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.1104/pp.105.063768

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The triple isotope composition (delta O-17 and delta O-18) of dissolved O-2 in the ocean and in ice cores was recently used to assess the primary productivity over broad spatial and temporal scales. However, assessment of the productivity with the aid of this method must rely on accurate measurements of the O-17/O-16 versus O-18/O-16 relationship in each of the main oxygen-producing and -consuming reactions. Data obtained here showed that cleavage of water in photosystem II did not fractionate oxygen isotopes; the delta O-18 and delta O-17 of the O-2 evolved were essentially identical to those of the substrate water. The fractionation slopes for the oxygenase reaction of Rubisco and respiration were identical (0.518 +/- 0.001) and that of glycolate oxidation was 0.503 +/- 0.002. There was a considerable difference in the slopes of O-2 photoreduction (the Mehler reaction) in the cyanobacterium Synechocystis sp. strain PCC 6803 (0.497 +/- 0.004) and that of pea (Pisum sativum) thylakoids (0.526 +/- 0.001). These values provided clear and independent evidence that the mechanism of O-2 photoreduction differs between higher plants and cyanobacteria. We used our method to assess the magnitude of O-2 photoreduction in cyanobacterial cells maintained under conditions where photorespiration was negligible. It was found that electron flow to O-2 can be as high as 40 % that leaving photosystem II, whereas respiratory activity in the light is only 6 %. The implications of our findings to the evaluation of specific O-2-producing or -consuming reactions, in vivo, are discussed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available