4.2 Article

Repetitive interactions observed in the crystal structure of a collagen-model peptide, [(Pro-Pro-Gly)9]3

Journal

JOURNAL OF BIOCHEMISTRY
Volume 138, Issue 2, Pages 135-144

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/jb/mvi108

Keywords

collagen; crystal structure; hydrogen-bonding network; hydrophobic interaction; triple-helix

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The crystal structure of a collagen-model peptide [(Pro-Pro-Gly)(9)](3) has been determined at 1.33 angstrom resolution. Diffraction data were collected at 100 K using synchrotron radiation, which led to the first structural study of [(Pro-Pro-Gly)(n)](3) under cryogenic conditions. The crystals belong to the P2(1) space group with cell parameters of a = 25.95, b = 26.56, c = 80.14 angstrom and beta = 90.0 degrees. The overall molecular conformation was consistent with the left-handed 7/2-helical model with an axial repeat of 20 A for native collagen. A total of 332 water molecules were found in an asymmetric unit. Proline residues in adjacent triple-helices exhibited three types of hydrophobic interactions. Furthermore, three types of hydrogen-bonding networks mediated by water molecules were observed between adjacent triple-helices. These hydrophobic interactions and hydrogen-bonding networks occurred at intervals of 20 angstrom along the c-axis based on the previous sub-cell structures [(Pro-Pro,-Gly)(10)](3) (n = 9, 10), which were also seen in the full-cell structure of [(Pro-Pro-Gly)(10)](3). Five proline residues at the Y position in the X-Y-Gly triplet were found in a down-puckering conformation, this being inconsistent with the recently proposed propensity-based hypothesis. These proline residues were forced to adopt opposing puckering because of the prevailing hydrophobic interaction between triple-helices compared with the Pro:Pro stacking interaction within a triple-helix.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available