4.6 Article

Cyclophosphamide decreases the number, percentage and the function of CD25+ CD4+ regulatory T cells, which suppress induction of contact hypersensitivity

Journal

JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGICAL SCIENCE
Volume 39, Issue 2, Pages 105-112

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jdermsci.2005.02.002

Keywords

cyclophosphamide (Cy); contact hypersensitivity reaction; CD25(+) CD24(+) regulatory T cell

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: It is well known that cyclophosphamide (Cy) treatment before sensitization paradoxically enhances rather than suppresses contact hypersensitivity (CH) reactions. In fact, Cy-treated mice developed a significant (p < 0.05) increase of the CH reactions to 2,4,6-trinitro-1-chrolobenzene (TNCB) in comparison with untreated mice. Objective: In order to examine whether the target cells of Cy in the immunoaugmentative effect are CD25(+) CD4(+) regulatory T cells or not, we investigated effect of Cy treatment on CD25(+) CD4(+) T cells. Method: We examined Cy-treated CD25(+) CD4(+) T cells by flow cytometer and by inhibition assay on proliferation of CD25(+) CD4(+) T cells. Results: Cy treatment remarkably reduced the number and percentage of CD25(+) CD4(+) T cells in the spleen and lymph nodes 3 and 5 days later. Moreover, CD25(+) CD4(+) T cells taken from the Cy-treated mice 3 days later showed the lower suppressive activity on proliferation of CD25(+) CD4(+) T cells, as compared to that from the untreated mice. Furthermore, transfer of CD25(+) CD4(+) T cells from untreated mice resulted in a significant decrease (p < 0.05) of the CH reactions enhanced by Cy treatment. Conclusion: These results indicate that enhancement of the CH reactions to TNCB by Cy treatment is attributed to the decrease in the number, percentage and the function of CD25(+) CD4(+) regulatory T cells. (c) 2005 Japanese Society for Investigative Dermatology. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available