4.6 Article

Lack of sex differences in modulation of experimental intraoral pain by diffuse noxious inhibitory controls (DNIC)

Journal

PAIN
Volume 116, Issue 3, Pages 359-365

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1016/j.pain.2005.05.006

Keywords

diffuse noxious inhibitory controls; gender; pain; sex

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The aims of this study were to investigate possible sex differences in (a) intraoral pain evoked by topical application of capsaicin to the gingiva, and (b) the modulation of this pain by diffuse noxious inhibitory controls (DNIC). Three groups with a total of fifty-four healthy volunteers (20 men, 20 women using oral contraceptives (W+OC), 14 women not using (W-OC)) completed the study. In two sessions, intraoral pain was evoked by topical application of 30 mu L 5% capsaicin to the gingiva. Conditioning stimuli were applied with three min hand immersion in ice water in one session and 30 degrees C water (control) in another session. The capsaicin-evoked pain and the water-evoked pain were evaluated by the participants on visual analogue scales (VAS). No main effects of group in capsaicin-evoked pain (P > 0.062) or water-evoked pain (P > 0.149) were found. There was a significant group x time interaction (P < 0.001) with W+OC reporting lower capsaicin-evoked pain scores than W-OC in the early phase (2-3 min) and lower pain scores than men in the later phase (5-11 min). The degree of modulation by DNIC did not differ between groups (P = 0.636). In conclusion, for a superficial type of intraoral pain, only minor sex differences were found in pain intensity and no differences in the degree of endogenous modulation by DNIC. Female sex and the use of OC may not consistently be associated with higher sensitivity to pain. (c) 2005 International Association for the Study of Pain. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available