4.5 Review

Biopsychosocial experiences of adults with congenital heart disease: Review of the literature

Journal

AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL
Volume 150, Issue 2, Pages 193-201

Publisher

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2004.08.025

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background Approximately 1% of all newborns display some form of congenital heart disease (CHID). Successful medical and surgical management of CHID has allowed 85% of these children to survive into adulthood and produced a new set of challenges for both patients and doctors with an emphasis on quality of life and psychosocial functioning. Methods The current paper has 3 aims: (1) to summarize the research literature examining the emotional adjustment among this population, (2) to detail the psychological, social, and quality-of-life factors that might result in an increased risk of psychological maladjustment,. and (3) to provide clinical management strategies to optimize health outcomes. Results Current empirical evidence has suggested that compared with same aged reference norms in US studies, adults with CHID had scores indicative of worse emotional functioning as assessed by both clinical interviews and self-report measures. Similar European studies have generally not demonstrated such differences. Additional research suggests that areas of functioning that may be particularly affected include neurocognitive functioning, body image, social and peer relationships, and mild delays in developmental functioning. Conclusions These studies suggest that patients with CHID are successfully engaging in full adult responsibilities and roles but do experience specific psychosocial challenges that may impact emotional functioning, self-perception, and peer relationships. Lifestyle considerations in young adulthood are significant and impinge on pregnancy considerations and exercise capabilities. Clinical management strategies include increased awareness and dialogue between patients with CHID and physicians regarding psychosocial concerns.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available