4.6 Article

Novel Probiotic Bifidobacterium longum subsp infantis CECT 7210 Strain Active against Rotavirus Infections

Journal

APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY
Volume 77, Issue 24, Pages 8775-8783

Publisher

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/AEM.05548-11

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Ministerio de Industria, Turismo y Comercio [PROFIT (FIT-0600000-2006-22)]
  2. European Social Fund [PTQ06-2-0642, PTQ05-0101208]
  3. ICREA (Catalonia, Spain)
  4. Laboratorios Ordesa

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Rotavirus is the leading cause of severe acute gastroenteritis among children worldwide. It is well known that breast-feeding and vaccination afford infants protection. Since breast-feeding has drastically decreased in developed countries, efforts have been focused on the potential use of probiotics as preventive agents. In this study, a novel Bifidobacterium longum subsp. infantis strain was isolated from infant feces and selected, based on its capacity to inhibit in vitro rotavirus Wa replication (up to 36.05% infectious foci reduction) and also to protect cells from virus infection (up to 48.50% infectious foci reduction) in both MA-104 and HT-29 cell lines. Furthermore, studies using a BALB/c mouse model have proved that this strain provides preliminary in vivo protection against rotavirus infection. The strain has been deposited in the Spanish Type Culture Collection under the accession number CECT 7210. This novel strain has the main properties required of a probiotic, such as resistance to gastrointestinal juices, biliary salts, NaCl, and low pH, as well as adhesion to intestinal mucus and sensitivity to antibiotics. The food safety status has been confirmed by the absence of undesirable metabolite production and in acute ingestion studies of mice. Overall, these results demonstrate that Bifidobacterium longum subsp. infantis CECT 7210 can be considered a probiotic able to inhibit rotavirus infection.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available