4.6 Article Proceedings Paper

Dietary protein and exercise have additive effects on body composition during weight loss in adult women

Journal

JOURNAL OF NUTRITION
Volume 135, Issue 8, Pages 1903-1910

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/jn/135.8.1903

Keywords

obesity; low-carbohydrate diets; blood lipids; insulin; adiponectin

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study examined the interaction of 2 diets (high protein, reduced carbohydrates vs. low protein, high carbohydrates) with exercise on body composition and blood lipids in women (n = 48, similar to 46 y old, BMI = 33 kg m(2)) during weight loss. The study was a 4-mo weight loss trial using a 2 X 2 block design (Diet X Exercise). Diets were equal in total energy (7.1 MJ/d) and lipids (similar to 30% energy intake) but differed in protein content and the ratio of carbohydrate: protein at 1.6 g/(kg center dot d) and <1.5 (PRO group) vs. 0.8 g/(kg center dot d) and >3.5 (CHO group), respectively. Exercise comparisons were lifestyle activity (control) vs. a supervised exercise program (EX: 5 d/wk walking and 2 d/wk resistance training). Subjects in the PRO and PRO + EX groups lost more total weight and fat mass and tended to lose less lean mass (P = 0.10) than the CHO and CHO + EX groups. Exercise increased loss of body fat and preserved lean mass. The combined effects of diet and exercise were additive for improving body composition. Serum lipid profiles improved in all groups, but changes varied among diet treatments. Subjects in the CHO groups had larger reductions in total cholesterol and LDL cholesterol, whereas subjects in the PRO groups had greater reductions in triacylglycerol and maintained higher concentrations of HDL cholesterol. This study demonstrated that a diet with higher protein and reduced carbohydrates combined with exercise additively improved body composition during weight loss, whereas the effects on blood lipids differed between diet treatments.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available