4.7 Article

Promoter hypermethylation profile of ovarian epithelial neoplasms

Journal

CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH
Volume 11, Issue 15, Pages 5365-5369

Publisher

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-04-2455

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: Ovarian carcinomas are believed to arise de novo from surface epithelium, but the actual molecular pathogenesis is unknown. The aim of this study was to compare the promoter hypermethylation profiles of ovarian epithelial neoplasms to better understand the role of epigenetic silencing in carcinogenesis. Experimental Design: We analyzed the DNA promoter methylation status of eight tumor suppressor and cancer-related genes (p16, RAR beta, E-cadherin H-cadherin, APC, GSTP1, MGMT, RASSF1A) in 23 benign cystadenomas, 23 low malignant potential (LMP) tumors, and 23 invasive carcinomas by methylation-specific PCR. Results: Benign cystadenomas exhibited promoter hypermethylation in only two genes, p16 (13%) and E-cadherin (13%). LMP tumors also showed p16 (22%) and E-cadherin (17%) methylation, in addition to RAR beta (9%) and H-cadherin (4%). All eight genes were hypermethylated in invasive cancers at a frequency of 9% to 30%. The mean methylation index was highest in invasive tumors [0.20 versus 0.065 (LMP) and 0,033 (cystadenomas); P = 0.001]. Promoter methylation of at least one gene was most commonly observed among invasive cancers [78% versus 44% (LMP; P = 0.03) and 26% (cystadenomas; P = 0.0009)]. Three genes exhibited higher methylation frequencies in invasive tumors: RASSF1A (30% versus 0%; P = 0.0002), H-cadherin (22% versus 2%; P = 0.013), and APC (22% versus 0%; P = 0.003). Conclusions: Promoter hypermethylation is a frequent epigenetic event that occurs most commonly in invasive epithelial ovarian carcinomas. The profile of aberrant methylation suggests that an accumulation of events at specific genes may trigger malignant transformation of some benign cystaclenomas and LMP tumors.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available