4.6 Article

Papillary serous carcinoma - A less radio-sensitive subtype of endometrial cancer

Journal

GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY
Volume 98, Issue 2, Pages 299-303

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2005.04.009

Keywords

carcinoma; uterine; papillary serous; radiation; pathologic response

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective. To explore factors that determine the response of endometrial cancer to radiation therapy. Such factors may influence treatment outcome and yield predictive information about individual patients and their tumors. Methods. A retrospective study of the complete pathologic response (pCR) rates in the hysterectomy specimens of patients, who had undergone pre-operative radiotherapy for >= Stage 11 biopsy-proven endornetrial carcinoma, was performed. 62 patient records were reviewed with respect to patient characteristics, tumor stage, histological grade and subtype, radiation technique and dose, and presence or absence of pCR in the post-operative hysterectomy specimen. Results. 24 of 62 specimens exhibited a pCR. The only significant factor with respect to pCR was presence of uterine papillary serous carcinoma (UPSC). None of the seven cases of UPSC displayed a pCR (P 0.036 Fischer's exact test), despite not differing from the non-UPSC cases in any other tumor, treatment, or patient factors. No factors were found that separated non-UPSC cases with a pCR from those without. Conclusions. These data suggest an intrinsic radioresistance within UPSC, which may have implications for future treatment strategies. UPSC has documented genetic aberrations that may account for this, although its true radio sensitivity has yet to be quantitated directly. Future studies should focus on the molecular basis of its response to radiation. The reasons for the heterogeneous response of non-UPSC has yet to be elucidated and should also be investigated. (c) 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available