4.5 Review

Steps of the tick-borne encephalitis virus replication cycle that affect neuropathogenesis

Journal

VIRUS RESEARCH
Volume 111, Issue 2, Pages 161-174

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.virusres.2005.04.007

Keywords

tick-borne encephalitis virus; neuropathogenesis; central nervous system; flavivirus

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Tick-borne encephalitis virus (TBEV) is an important human pathogen that causes severe neurological illness in large areas of Europe and Asia. The neuropathognesis of this disease agent is determined by its capacity to enter the central nervous system (CNS) after peripheral inoculation (neuroinvasiveness) and its ability to replicate and cause damage within the CNS (neurovirulence). TBEV is a small, enveloped flavivirus with an unsegmented, positive-stranded RNA genome. Mutations affecting various steps of its natural replication cycle were shown to influence its neuropathogenic properties. This review describes experimental approaches and summarizes results on molecular determinants of neurovirulence and neuroinvasiveness that have been identified for this virus. It focuses on molecular mechanisms of three particular steps of the viral life cycle that have been studied in some detail for TBEV and two closely related tick-borne flaviviruses (Louping ill virus (LIV) and Langat virus (LGTV)), namely (i) the envelope protein E and its role in viral attachment to the cell surface, (ii) the 3'-noncoding region of the genome and its importance for viral RNA replication, and (iii) the capsid protein C and its role in the assembly process of infectious virus particles. Mutations affecting each of these three molecular targets significantly influence neuropathogenesis of TBEV, particularly its neuroinvasiveness. The understanding of molecular determinants of TBEV neuropathogenesis is relevant for vaccine development, also against other flaviviruses. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available