4.7 Article

Nonlinear k⊥ factorization for quark-gluon dijet production off nuclei -: art. no. 034033

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW D
Volume 72, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.72.034033

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The breaking of conventional linear k(perpendicular to) factorization for hard processes in a nuclear environment is by now well established. Here we report a detailed derivation of the nonlinear k(perpendicular to)-factorization relations for the production of quark-gluon dijets. This process is the dominant source of dijets in the proton hemisphere of proton-nucleus collisions at energies of the relativistic heavy ion collider (RHIC). The major technical problem is a consistent description of the non-Abelian intranuclear evolution of multiparton systems of color dipoles. Following the technique developed in our early work [N. N. Nikolaev, W. Schafer, B. G. Zakharov, and V. R. Zoller, J. Exp. Theor. Phys. 97, 441 (2003)], we reduce the description of the intranuclear evolution of the qgg (q) over bar state to the 3x3 system of coupled equations in the space of color-singlet 4-parton states parallel to 3 (3) over bar >, parallel to 6 (6) over bar >, and parallel to 15 (15) over bar > (and their large-N-c generalizations). At large number of colors N-c, the eigenstate (parallel to 6 (6) over bar >-parallel to 15 (15) over bar >)/root 2 decouples from the initial state parallel to 3 (3) over bar >. The resulting nuclear distortions of the dijet spectrum exhibit much similarity to those found earlier for forward dijets in deep inelastic scattering. Still there are certain distinctions regarding the contribution from color-triplet qg final states and from coherent diffraction excitation of dijets. To the large-N-c approximation, we identify four universality classes of nonlinear k(perpendicular to) factorization for hard dijet production.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available