4.6 Article

Different Atmospheric Methane-Oxidizing Communities in European Beech and Norway Spruce Soils

Journal

APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY
Volume 76, Issue 10, Pages 3228-3235

Publisher

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/AEM.02730-09

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [KO2912/2-1]
  2. ESF
  3. University of Bayreuth

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Norway spruce (Picea abies) forests exhibit lower annual atmospheric methane consumption rates than do European beech (Fagus sylvatica) forests. In the current study, pmoA (encoding a subunit of membrane-bound CH4 monooxygenase) genes from three temperate forest ecosystems with both beech and spruce stands were analyzed to assess the potential effect of tree species on methanotrophic communities. A pmoA sequence difference of 7% at the derived protein level correlated with the species-level distance cutoff value of 3% based on the 16S rRNA gene. Applying this distance cutoff, higher numbers of species-level pmoA genotypes were detected in beech than in spruce soil samples, all affiliating with upland soil cluster alpha (USC alpha). Additionally, two deep-branching genotypes (named 6 and 7) were present in various soil samples not affiliating with pmoA or amoA. Abundance of USC alpha pmoA genes was higher in beech soils and reached up to (1.2 +/- 0.2) x 10(8) pmoA genes per g of dry weight. Calculated atmospheric methane oxidation rates per cell yielded the same trend. However, these values were below the theoretical threshold necessary for facilitating cell maintenance, suggesting that USC alpha species might require alternative carbon or energy sources to thrive in forest soils. These collective results indicate that the methanotrophic diversity and abundance in spruce soils are lower than those of beech soils, suggesting that tree species-related factors might influence the in situ activity of methanotrophs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available