4.6 Article

Influence of Molecular Resolution on Sequence-Based Discovery of Ecological Diversity among Synechococcus Populations in an Alkaline Siliceous Hot Spring Microbial Mat

Journal

APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY
Volume 77, Issue 4, Pages 1359-1367

Publisher

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/AEM.02032-10

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [EF-0328698]
  2. National Aeronautics and Space Administration Exobiology Program [NAG5-8807]
  3. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Office of Biological and Environmental Research (BER)
  4. GSP Foundational Scientific Focus Area (FSFA) at the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) [112443]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Previous research has shown that sequences of 16S rRNA genes and 16S-23S rRNA internal transcribed spacer regions may not have enough genetic resolution to define all ecologically distinct Synechococcus populations (ecotypes) inhabiting alkaline, siliceous hot spring microbial mats. To achieve higher molecular resolution, we studied sequence variation in three protein-encoding loci sampled by PCR from 60 degrees C and 65 degrees C sites in the Mushroom Spring mat (Yellowstone National Park, WY). Sequences were analyzed using the ecotype simulation (ES) and AdaptML algorithms to identify putative ecotypes. Between 4 and 14 times more putative ecotypes were predicted from variation in protein-encoding locus sequences than from variation in 16S rRNA and 16S-23S rRNA internal transcribed spacer sequences. The number of putative ecotypes predicted depended on the number of sequences sampled and the molecular resolution of the locus. Chao estimates of diversity indicated that few rare ecotypes were missed. Many ecotypes hypothesized by sequence analyses were different in their habitat specificities, suggesting different adaptations to temperature or other parameters that vary along the flow channel.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available