4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Inhibitory effects of anti-CXCR4 antibodies on human colon cancer cells

Journal

CANCER IMMUNOLOGY IMMUNOTHERAPY
Volume 54, Issue 8, Pages 781-791

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00262-004-0636-3

Keywords

CXCL12; CXCR4; colorectal cancer; chemotaxis; adhesion; proliferation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: CXCR4, the chemokine receptor for CXCL12, has recently been involved in the metastatic process of several neoplasms. Materials and methods: The expression of CXCR4 was evaluated by immunohistochemistry of colorectal tissue samples and by flow cytometry on Caco2, GEO, SW480, SW48, Lovo and SW620 human colon carcinoma cell lines. Correlations with pathological characteristics of the specimens were analysed with chi-square test. To verify the functional status of CXCR4, cell lines were tested in adhesion, migration, and proliferation assays. Results: We studied the expression of CXCR4 in 88 human colorectal tissues and we found that CXCR4 was expressed in > 10% of epithelial cells in 50% of normal mucosae (7/14), in 55% of polyps (29/53), in all of carcinomas (16/16) and hepatic metastasis (5/5). Notably, CXCR4 was significantly over-expressed in cancerous lesions (carcinomas and metastasis) compared to non-cancerous lesions (normal mucosa and polyps) (P=0.003) and in adenomatous polyps versus hyperplastic polyps (P=0.009). The diameter of a polyp was also significantly associated with CXCR4 expression (P=0.031). SW480, SW48 and SW620 cell lines showed the highest levels of CXCR4 (60-80% of positive cells). Adhesion, migration, and proliferation increased in response to the CXCL12 chemokine. These effects were abrogated by the addition of anti-CXCR4 antibodies. Further, CXCL12 activated ERK1/2 in SW480 cells. Conclusions: These data suggest that CXCR4 might play a role in colon cancer cell properties and that anti-CXCR4 antibodies could have therapeutic effects against colorectal cancer.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available