4.5 Article

Comparative evaluation of implant designs: influence of diameter, length, and taper on strains in the alveolar crest - A three-dimensional finite-element analysis

Journal

CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH
Volume 16, Issue 4, Pages 486-494

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01132.x

Keywords

crestal bone; endosseous dental implant; finite-element method; implant diameter; implant length; maximum shear strain; tapered implants; two-level factorial analysis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives: Our aim was to analyze and compare systematically the relative and interactive effects of implant diameter, length, and taper on calculated crestal bone strains. Material and methods: Three-dimensional finite-element models were created of a 20-mm premolar section of the mandible with a single endosseous implant embedded in high- or low-density cancellous bone. Oblique (200-N vertical and 40-N horizontal) occlusal loading was applied. Cortical and cancellous bone were modeled as transversely isotropic and linearly elastic. Perfect bonding was assumed at all interfaces. A two-level factorial statistical design was used to determine the main and interactive effects of four implant design variables on maximum shear strains in the crestal alveolar bone: diameter, length of tapered segment, length of untapered segment, and taper. Implant diameter ranged from 3.5 to 6 mm, total implant length from 5.75 to 23.5 mm, and taper from 0 to 14 degrees, resulting in 16 implant designs. Results: Increasing implant diameter resulted in as much as a 3.5-fold reduction in crestal strain, increasing length caused as much as a 1.65-fold reduction, whereas taper increased crestal strain, especially in narrow and short implants, where it increased 1.65-fold. Diameter, length, and taper have to be considered together because of their interactive effects on crestal bone strain. Conclusion: If the objective is to minimize peri-implant strain in the crestal alveolar bone, a wide and relatively long, untapered implant appears to be the most favorable choice. Narrow, short implants with taper in the crestal region should be avoided, especially in low-density bone.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available