4.6 Article Proceedings Paper

Preservation of static and dynamic cerebral autoregulation after mild hypothermic cardiopulmonary bypass

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA
Volume 95, Issue 2, Pages 207-211

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/bja/aei147

Keywords

brain, blood flow; brain, cerebral autoregulation; surgery, cardiac

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background. Dysfunction of cerebral autoregulation might contribute to neurological morbidity after cardiac surgery. In this study, our aim was to assess the preservation of cerebral autoregulation after cardiac surgery involving cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). Methods. Dynamic and static components of cerebral autoregulation were evaluated in 12 patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery, anaesthetized with midazolam, fentanyl, and propofol, and using mild hypothermic CPB (31-33 degrees C). Arterial pressure (ABP), central venous pressure (CVP), and blood flow velocity in the middle cerebral artery (CBFV) were recorded. The cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) was calculated as a difference between mean ABP and CVP. Rapid decrease of CPP was caused by a sudden change of patients' position from Trendelenburg to reverse Trendelenburg. Cerebral vascular resistance (CVR) was calculated by dividing CPP by CBFV. Index of static cerebral autoregulation (CAstat) was calculated as the change of CVR related to change of CPP during the manoeuvre. Dynamic rate of autoregulation (RoRdyn) was determined as the change in CVR per second during the first 4 s immediately after a decrease in CPP, related to the change of CPP. Measurements were obtained after induction of anaesthesia, and 15, 30, and 45 min after termination of CPB. Results. No significant changes were found in CAstat or RoRdyn after CPB. Significant changes in CVR could be explained by concomitant changes in body temperature and haematocrit. Conclusion. Autoregulation of cerebral blood flow remains preserved after mild hypothermic CPB.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available