4.7 Article

Hypoxia-inducible factor 1α polymorphism and coronary collaterals in patients with ischemic heart disease

Journal

CHEST
Volume 128, Issue 2, Pages 787-791

Publisher

AMER COLL CHEST PHYSICIANS
DOI: 10.1378/chest.128.2.787

Keywords

collaterals; genetics; genotype; ischemia

Funding

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [P01-HL65608, R01-HL55338] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Study objectives; Marked variability exists in coronary artery collaterals in patients with ischemic heart disease. Although multiple factors are thought to play a role in collateral development, the contribution of genetic factors is largely unknown. Hypoxia inducible factor 1 (HIF-1), a transcriptional activator that functions as a master regulator of oxygen homeostasis, is one possible genetic factor that could play an important role in modulating collateral development. Design, setting, and participants: Collateral vessels were determined in 100 patients with >= 70% narrowing of at least one coronary artery without acute myocardial infarction or prior revascularization. DNA was genotyped for the presence of a single nucleotide (C to T) polymorphism that changes residue 582 of HIF-1 alpha from proline to serine. Measurements and results: The frequency of the T allele was significantly higher among patients without collaterals compared to patients with collaterals (0.188 vs 0.037, p < 0.001). In multivariate analyses, two variables affecting collateral formation were detected: two- or three-vessel coronary, artery disease was a significant positive predictor (odds ratio [OR], 4.17; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.61 to 10.8; p = 0.001), whereas the presence of HIF-1 alpha genotype CT or TT was a negative predictor (OR, 0.19; 95% CI, 0.04 to 0.84; p = 0.03). Conclusions: These data suggest that variations in HIF-1 alpha genotype may influence development of coronary artery collaterals in patients with significant coronary artery disease.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available