4.6 Article

Combined Gel Probe and Isotope Labeling Technique for Measuring Dissimilatory Nitrate Reduction to Ammonium in Sediments at Millimeter-Level Resolution

Journal

APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY
Volume 76, Issue 18, Pages 6239-6247

Publisher

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/AEM.01104-10

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. German Science Foundation [STI202/4]
  2. Max Planck Society

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Dissimilatory NO3- reduction in sediments is often measured in bulk incubations that destroy in situ gradients of controlling factors such as sulfide and oxygen. Additionally, the use of unnaturally high NO3- concentrations yields potential rather than actual activities of dissimilatory NO3- reduction. We developed a technique to determine the vertical distribution of the net rates of dissimilatory nitrate reduction to ammonium (DNRA) with minimal physical disturbance in intact sediment cores at millimeter-level resolution. This allows DNRA activity to be directly linked to the microenvironmental conditions in the layer of NO3- consumption. The water column of the sediment core is amended with (NO3-)-N-15 at the in situ (NO3-)-N-14 concentration. A gel probe is deployed in the sediment and is retrieved after complete diffusive equilibration between the gel and the sediment pore water. The gel is then sliced and the NH4+ dissolved in the gel slices is chemically converted by hypobromite to N-2 in reaction vials. The isotopic composition of N-2 is determined by mass spectrometry. We used the combined gel probe and isotopic labeling technique with freshwater and marine sediment cores and with sterile quartz sand with artificial gradients of (NH4+)-N-15. The results were compared to the NH4+ microsensor profiles measured in freshwater sediment and quartz sand and to the N2O microsensor profiles measured in acetylene-amended sediments to trace denitrification.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available