4.6 Article

Quantification of Shiga Toxin-Converting Bacteriophages in Wastewater and in Fecal Samples by Real-Time Quantitative PCR

Journal

APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY
Volume 76, Issue 17, Pages 5693-5701

Publisher

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/AEM.00107-10

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Generalitat de Catalunya [2009SGR1043]
  2. Spanish Ministry of Education and Science [AGL200601566/ALI, AGL2009-07576, FPI 20060054361]
  3. Xarxa de Referencia en Biotecnologia (XeRBa)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Shiga toxin-converting bacteriophages (Stx phages) are involved in the pathogenicity of some enteric bacteria, such as Escherichia coli O157:H7. Stx phages are released from their bacterial hosts after lytic induction and remain free in the environment. Samples were analyzed for the presence of free Stx phages by an experimental approach based on the use of real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR), which enables stx to be detected in the DNA from the viral fraction of each sample. A total of 150 samples, including urban raw sewage samples, wastewater samples with fecal contamination from cattle, pigs, and poultry, and fecal samples from humans and diverse animals, were used in this study. Stx phages were detected in 70.0% of urban sewage samples (10 to 10(3) gene copies [GC] per ml) and in 94.0% of animal wastewater samples of several origins (10 to 10(10) GC per ml). Eighty-nine percent of cattle fecal samples were positive for Stx phages (10 to 10(5) GC per g of sample), as were 31.8% of other fecal samples of various origins (10 to 10(4) GC per g of sample). The stx(2) genes and stx(2) variants were detected in the viral fraction of some of the samples after sequencing of stx(2) fragments amplified by conventional PCR. The occurrence and abundance of Stx phages in the extraintestinal environment confirm the role of Stx phages as a reservoir of stx in the environment.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available