4.6 Article

Gene Expression in Proliferating Cells of the Dinoflagellate Alexandrium catenella (Dinophyceae)

Journal

APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY
Volume 76, Issue 13, Pages 4521-4529

Publisher

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/AEM.02345-09

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Agence Nationale de la Recherche [ANR-05-BLAN-0219 XPressFlorAl, ANR-06-BLAN-0397 GenoSynTox]
  2. National Program Ecosphere Continentale et Cotiere (EC2CO-PNEC)
  3. Ifremer
  4. cluster Infrastructures en Biologie Sante et Agronomie
  5. Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Understanding the conditions leading to harmful algal blooms, especially those produced by toxic dinoflagellate species, is important for environmental and health safety. In addition to investigations into the environmental conditions necessary for the formation of toxic blooms, we postulate that investigating gene expression in proliferating cells is essential for understanding bloom dynamics. Expressed sequence tags were produced from cultured cells of the toxic dinoflagellate Alexandrium catenella sampled during the initiation phase of growth using Sanger's method and by 454 pyrosequencing. A significant proportion of identified genes (ca. 25%) represented enzymes and proteins that participate in a variety of cellular regulatory mechanisms that may characterize proliferating cells, e. g., control of the cell cycle and division, regulation of transcription, translation and posttranslational protein modifications, signaling, intracellular trafficking, and transport. All of the several genes selected for gene expression assays due to their involvement in metabolism and the cell cycle were overexpressed during exponential growth. These data will be useful for investigating the mechanisms underlying growth and toxin production in toxic Alexandrium species and for studying and monitoring the development of toxic blooms.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available