4.5 Article

Psychological status and depression in patients with liver cirrhosis

Journal

DIGESTIVE AND LIVER DISEASE
Volume 37, Issue 8, Pages 593-600

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2005.01.020

Keywords

anxiety; depression; liver cirrhosis; psychological well-being

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background. Previous studies reported an impairment of both the physical and mental dimensions of quality of life in patients with cirrhosis. Very few data are available on the psychological impact of the disease and its relation to liver function. Aim. To measure the psychological status of patients with cirrhosis in relation to the severity of the liver impairment. Patients and methods. One hundred and fifty-six patients with cirrhosis were studied. Two questionnaires (the Beck Depression Inventory and the Psychological General Well-Being Index) were self-administered in random order. Clinical and laboratory data were collected using standardised forms. Results. The global score of Psychological General Well-Being Index was severely reduced compared to Italian population norm. Among individual domains, the more severely affected was General Health, the less compromised was Positive Well-Being. A negative relation was found between Child-Pugh score (a comprehensive measure of disease severity) and global Psychological General Well-Being Index and several individual subscales. The Beck Depression Inventory scores were indicative of a depressed mood in over 50% of patients, in relation to the presence of clinical symptoms. Conclusions. Patients with cirrhosis have signs of psychological distress and depression, as assessed by Beck Depression Inventory and Psychological General Well-Being Index, in relation to the severity of liver disease. Accordingly, a non-negligible number of patients warrant treatment. (C) 2005 Editrice Gastroenterologica Italiana S.r.l. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available