4.6 Article

Source of Nitrous Oxide Emissions during the Cow Manure Composting Process as Revealed by Isotopomer Analysis of and amoA Abundance in Betaproteobacterial Ammonia-Oxidizing Bacteria

Journal

APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY
Volume 76, Issue 5, Pages 1555-1562

Publisher

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/AEM.01394-09

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Agriculture and Food Research Organization (NARO), Japan [19201004]
  2. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT), Japan
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [19201004] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A molecular analysis of betaproteobacterial ammonia oxidizers and a N2O isotopomer analysis were conducted to study the sources of N2O emissions during the cow manure composting process. Much NO2--N and NO3--N and the Nitrosomonas europaea-like amoA gene were detected at the surface, especially at the top of the composting pile, suggesting that these ammonia-oxidizing bacteria (AOB) significantly contribute to the nitrification which occurs at the surface layer of compost piles. However, the N-15 site preference within the asymmetric N2O molecule (SP = delta N-15(alpha) delta N-15(beta), where N-15(alpha) and N-15(beta) represent the N-15/N-14 ratios at the center and end sites of the nitrogen atoms, respectively) indicated that the source of N2O emissions just after the compost was turned originated mainly from the denitrification process. Based on these results, the reduction of accumulated NO2--N or NO3--N after turning was identified as the main source of N2O emissions. The site preference and bulk delta N-15 results also indicate that the rate of N2O reduction was relatively low, and an increased value for the site preference indicates that the nitrification which occurred mainly in the surface layer of the pile partially contributed to N2O emissions between the turnings.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available