4.5 Article

Cellular endotoxin desensitization in patients with severe chronic heart failure

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEART FAILURE
Volume 7, Issue 5, Pages 865-868

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejheart.2004.09.014

Keywords

heart failure; lipopolysaccharide; cytokines

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Increased levels of bacterial lipopolysaccharide (LPS) have been demonstrated in chronic heart failure (CHF). LPS can induce cellular desensitization, with specific down-regulation of LPS-mediated cellular tumor necrosis factor (TNF-alpha) production which does not affect other cytokine parameters. It is not known if LPS desensitization occurs in CHF. Methods and results: Mononuclear cells from 24 CHF patients (mean age 70 +/- 2 years, age range 58 to 78 years, NYHA class 3.0 +/- 0.2) and I I healthy controls (mean age 53 +/- 3 years, age range 39 to 75 years) were separated frorn venous blood and Cultured for 24 It with LPS (E, coli, 0-10 ng/mL). Culture supernatants were tested for TNF-alpha and interleukin receptor antagonist (IL- IRA). Patients were subgrouped into mild (n=1 0), moderate (n=5), and severe (n=9) CHF. Independently of age, rnononuclear cells from patients with severe heart failure produced less TNF-alpha than controls (p < 0.05) and patients with mild (p < 0.001) or moderate CHF (p < 0.05). IL- I RA release was higher for CHF patients as a group, compared with controls (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference in IL-1RA release between CHF patient subgroups. Conclusions: Mononuclear cells from patients with severe heart failure produce significantly less TNF-a than healthy controls or patients with mild to moderate disease. Production of IL-1RA is not affected. This resembles a picture indicative of LPS desensitization occurring in patients with severe CHF. (c) 2004 European Society of Cardiology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available