4.4 Article

Development of porcine embryos in vivo and in vitro; evidence for embryo 'cross talk' in vitro

Journal

DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY
Volume 284, Issue 1, Pages 62-71

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2005.05.001

Keywords

porcine; preimplantation; embryos; culture; autocrine/paracrine

Funding

  1. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [E18522] Funding Source: Medline
  2. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [E18522] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The in vitro development of zygotes of domestic species to the blastocyst stage is facilitated by culture in groups, suggesting a role for autocrine/paracrine factors. A novel method was used to investigate the potential role of such factors using in-vitro-produced and in-vivo-derived porcine embryos. The development of individual zygotes to the blastocyst stage was optimal when they were cultured 81-160 mu m apart. As the distance between the embryos was increased, blastocyst rates declined significantly, reaching zero beyond 640 mu m. Blastocyst volume and cell number (both inner cell mass and trophectoderm) were also increased when the distance apart was between 81 and 160 mu m. Culturing embryos in groups at different stages of development suggested that group culture confers a greater advantage to development after the activation of the genome. Group culture of in-vivo-derived embryos showed a weak distance effect. The results suggest a role for as yet unknown diffusible paracrine/autocrine factors released by early porcine embryos in promoting the growth of neighbouring embryos in vitro. This advantage is observed to a lesser extent by in-vivo-derived zygotes which are likely to have been better conditioned for development in vitro by being conceived in the female reproductive tract. (c) 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available